|
Beginning Entry Very little
important, information was recorded. Key details such as purpose
for the voyage and goals were left out. Most important, information
was included. No more than one important detail was left out. All important, relevant
information including purpose for voyage, hopes and goals, crew info.
etc. was reported during the first entries. . Middle Entry Explorers thoughts and
feelings about people, places, events, and the voyage are rarely shown. Explorers thoughts and
feelings about people, places, events, and the voyage are expressed sometimes. Explorers thoughts and
feelings about people, places, events, and the voyage are clearly
expressed at appropriate times throughout the voyage. . Last entry information, thoughts,
ideas, feelings, reflection, reaction Very little important,
relevant information was included toward the end of the journal. The
ending sounds choppy and unfinished. Most important, relevant
information including successes, discoveries, and length of voyage
were reported during the last entry or two. All important, relevant
information including successes, discoveries, reflection, and length of
voyage were reported during the last entry or two. . Appearance (Spelling, Mechanics,
Grammar, Neatness) Your journal has several
spelling, mechanics, or grammar errors. It is difficult to read. Your journal has very few
spelling, mechanics, or grammar errors. It is bound neatly and is easy
to read. Your journal has been
thoroughly checked for spelling, mechanics, and grammar errors. It is
easy to read. . Total
Appearance It was difficult to tell
what your artifacts/tools were because they lacked detail and/or color. Most artifacts/tools were
appealing, and colorful (where appropriate) All artifacts/tools were
appealing, and colorful (where appropriate) It is obvious you took your
time when creating these. . Relevance Few of your artifacts/tools
represent a part of your explorer's journey. When asked, you are unable
to explain their significance. Most of your artifacts/tools
represent some aspect of your explorer's journey. When asked, you are
usually able to explain their significance. All of your artifacts/tools
clearly represent some aspect of your explorer's journey. When asked,
you are able to explain their significance. . Total .
Criteria Color & Appearance Little evidence of effort
to create an appealing map. Lacks color. Limited or no use of color Fairly neat with color
enhancement. Map is neatly done, color
enhanced and pleasing to the eye.` .. Routes (arrows & dates included) Explorer's routes lack
important details such as arrows, dates, and labels. Most explorer's routes are
drawn and include arrows, dates, and labels. All explorer's routes are
drawn and include arrows, dates, and labels. .. Labels Few items are labeled and
located correctly. Missing several of the following: countries, oceans,
routes, lakes, mountains, etc.; Some of the items are
labeled and located correctly May be missing: countries, oceans, routes,
lakes, mountains, etc. Most items
are labeled and located correctly. Includes: countries, oceans, routes,
lakes, mountains, etc. Labels are very easy to read. . Total .
Appearance Little evidence of effort to create an appealing
poem. Lacks neatness. Has several spelling mistakes. Fairly neat with color added to it. Has 3 or 4 spelling errors. Poem is neatly done and has few spelling errors. . Relevance Your poem does not contain accurate facts about your
explorer. Your poems contains some factual information about
your explorer. Your poem shows your complete understanding of your
explorer's life. . Total .
Appearance Your chest held very few of
your materials. It's difficult to tell that it is supposed to be a
treasure chest. Your chest was large enough
to hold some of your materials. It's color and design closely resemble
that of a real treasure chest. Your chest was large enough
to hold most of your materials. It's color and design are an excellent
depiction of a real treasure chest. . Total .
Voice Rarely demonstrated a
confident voice tone. Voice was not loud enough
for audience to hear. Monotone throughout. Occasionally demonstrated a
confident voice tone Voice was sometimes loud
enough for audience to hear. Monotone at times. Frequently demonstrated a
confident voice tone Voice was loud enough for
audience to hear. Not monotone. Consistently demonstrated a
confident voice tone Voice was loud enough for
audience to hear. Lively and engaging presentation. . Content Facts were choppy and
inaccurate. Some facts were choppy and
inaccurate Few facts were choppy and
inaccurate No facts were choppy and
inaccurate. . Visual Aides No use of visual
(artifacts, map, tools, etc.) Size of objects were not
appropriate for audience. Little use of visual aids
(artifacts, map, tools, etc.) Size of some objects were
not appropriate for audience Sufficient use of visual
aids (artifacts, map, tools, etc.) Size of objects were
appropriate for audience. Excellent use of visual
aids (artifacts, map, tools, etc.) Size of objects were very
appropriate for audience. . Organization Presentation had no
sequence to it Rarely maintained smooth
flow and pace Some things were out of
order Flow and pace was somewhat
adequate Few things were out of
order Flow and pace was mostly
smooth Nothing was out of order. Flow and pace was smooth
throughout presentation. . Eye Contact Rarely made eye-contact
with the audience Occasionally made
eye-contact with the audience Frequently made eye-contact
with the audience Consistently made
eye-contact with the audience . Cohesiveness with Group Did not work well as a
group Some cohesion between
members Worked well as a group Worked exceptionally well
with group . Total .
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||